21. Ott MA et al., This new exchange-from ranging from hormones contraceptives and you may condoms among teenagers, Views for the Sexual and you can Reproductive Fitness, 2002, 34(1):6–fourteen.
twenty-two. Wilson EK and you can Koo Horsepower, Contacts ranging from reasonable-earnings ladies’ relationships qualities as well as their birth prevention use, Viewpoints toward Sexual and Reproductive Fitness, 2008, 40(3):171–179.
23. Aalsma MC et al., Family members and you may buddy closeness so you’re able to teenage sexual partners from inside the link to condom use, Record out of Teenage Health, 2006, 38(3):173–178.
24. Sayegh MA et al., This new developmental organization off matchmaking quality, hormones birth control options and you will condom non-have fun with certainly one of teenage women, Journal regarding Teenage Wellness, 2006, 39(3):388–395.
twenty-five. Umphrey L and you can Sherblom J, Relational connection and you can dangers to relationship repairs specifications: affects with the condom use, Log out of American College or university Health, 2007, 56(1):61–68.
twenty seven. Manning WD et al., More youthful adult relationship dating while the management of sexual exposure, Populace Search and Rules Review, 2012, 31(2):165–185.
twenty eight. Manlove J et al., Adolescent mothers from inside the promote proper care: chance factors and you may results for youth as well as their people, Lookup Short term, Washington, DC: Child Manner, 2011.
29. DiClemente RJ ainsi que al., Sexual exposure behavior in the with older sex lovers: a study of black teenage females, Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2002, 29(1):20–24.
32. Fortenberry JD mais aussi al., Condom explore while the a function of amount of time in the latest and you may established teenage sexual relationship, Western Journal from Social Fitness, 2002, 92(2):211–213.
33. Manlove JS, Ryan S and you can Franzetta K, Risk and you can protective points regarding the change to help you an initial sexual connection with an adult partner, Log of Teenage Health, 2007, 40(2):135–143.
34. Manlove J, Ryan S and you can Franzetta K, Birth prevention have fun with patterns round the teens’ sexual relationship, paper displayed within annual appointment of your People Connection away from America, Philadelphia, .
35. Manning WD, Giordano Desktop and Longmore MA, Hooking up: the relationship contexts of “nonrelationship” sex, Log out-of Teenage Search, 2006, 21(5):459–483.
36. Carlson MJ and Furstenberg FF, Jr, The consequences of multi-partnered fertility for parental resources and matchmaking, paper showed on annual fulfilling of one’s Association to own Social Rules Studies and Management, Arizona, DC, .
37. Lichter DT and you may Graefe DR, Finding a mate? The latest relationship and you will cohabitation histories away from unwed moms and dads, in: Wu LL and you will Wolfe B, eds., Out of Wedlock: Factors and you can Outcomes out-of Nonmarital Fertility, New york: Russell Sage Basis, 2001, pp. 317–343.
40. Kirby D, Growing Solutions 2007: Browse Conclusions on the Programs to minimize Teenager Pregnancy and Sexually Carried Illness, Washington, DC: Federal Strategy to prevent Teen and you will Unexpected Pregnancy, 2007.
41. Kirby D, The latest impact regarding applications to boost birth-control fool around with one of mature feminine: a look at fresh and you will quasi-fresh degree, Point of views into Sexual and you will Reproductive Fitness, 2008, 40(1):34–41.
Author’s Associations
Jennifer Manlove try program urban area manager and you may senior browse scientist, Kate Welti was look researcher, Age Wildsmith is elder look scientist and you can Megan Barry are browse analyst, all the on Youngster Styles, Bethesda, MD.
Records
In the first studies, that used an area-town sample out-of teenagers in the Kansas, Manning and you can acquaintances 9 labeled relationships properties to your you to definitely directory regarding positive attributes (eg close self-disclosure, romantic love and you will relationships salience) and another index from negative characteristics (including argument and nonexclusivity). It unearthed that highest scores for the sometimes list was from the less condom feel. Descriptive analyses including ideal one to a mixture of higher positive and high negative ratings try regarding the shorter condom consistency.
In the each round, members was asked “Because go out out-of history interview, will you be during the an online dating matchmaking where you think from on your own as part of a couple?” We https://kissbridesdate.com/hot-latina-women/ thought respondents to settle a matchmaking relationships once they replied sure whenever the fresh partner was a current relationship lover, in the place of a partner, cohabiting spouse otherwise former mate. Same-sex relationships matchmaking and those where the respondent got before cohabited with the companion were omitted. Complete, cuatro,013 respondents stated a recent relationship relationship while in the 2002–2005. Of leftover respondents, 553 were not regarding attempt in rounds of interest, step 1,876 had been cohabiting otherwise hitched, and you will 2,542 had no latest relationship dating. Participants in our attempt have been aged 18–twenty six.
Relationships relationship try considering a couple strategies. The initial is actually an effective 0–ten level where respondents rated the right which they and the spouse was to one another inside the 6 months. A rating out-of no shown no chance; a ten conveyed 100% likelihood. I classified this chances because the lower (lower than six), typical (6–9) or large (10). To your next way of measuring commitment, we included a changeable for whether the couple got talked about matrimony or cohabitation; solutions was basically categorized as chatted about none, discussed cohabitation or chatted about wedding. (Respondents just who advertised which have discussed both cohabitation and you may relationship were provided regarding the relationships category.)
Heterogeneous contraception consequences within this longer term dating also may help explain down birth prevention feel from inside the prolonged teenage relationships, even with better probability of ever before-accessibility contraceptives. 32, 33 Prior studies have interpreted it looking by positing one to partners are able to from time to time forgo birth-control include in more severe dating; 32, 34 however, all of our efficiency advise that reduced birth prevention explore tends to be concentrated in the long-emergency room name matchmaking characterized by higher conflict and lower connection.
Acknowledgments
20. Ku L, Sonenstein Fl and you may Pleck JH, The character out-of young men’s room condom have fun with throughout the and across matchmaking, Family Thought Views, 1994, 26(6):246–251.
